Author Topic: 100tmx>1600 HC110 'B' 26C 60' semi stand  (Read 1636 times)

k.hendrik

  • 120
  • **
  • Posts: 52
100tmx>1600 HC110 'B' 26C 60' semi stand
« on: January 26, 2015, 07:01:03 PM »


don't know what went wrong but I like it
« Last Edit: April 16, 2015, 02:13:19 PM by k.hendrik »

k.hendrik

  • 120
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: 100tmx>1600 HC110 'B' 26C 60' semi stand
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2015, 08:01:45 PM »


I like the grain too; thanks for looking
« Last Edit: April 16, 2015, 02:13:30 PM by k.hendrik »

Mike (happyforest)

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 561
Re: 100tmx>1600 HC110 'B' 26C 60' semi stand
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2015, 09:44:18 PM »
Striking effect.  I wonder what happened.

Mike

Indofunk

  • Global Moderator
  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,562
    • photog & music
Re: 100tmx>1600 HC110 'B' 26C 60' semi stand
« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2015, 09:56:02 PM »
Did you squeegie the film by hand? The streaks look kind of like when I shot a roll of decades-old FP4 and managed to scratch some of the emulsion off whilst squeegieing. For example, here: http://www.indofunkstudios.com/images/minolta_srt102/2014_08_27_fp4/20140827-05-orig.jpg

Also, I didn't even realize that a dilution as strong as dilution B could be used to stand develop. I usually stand develop at 1:100.

Finally, or rather foremost, I like the images and the effect :)
« Last Edit: January 26, 2015, 09:57:34 PM by Indofunk »

jojonas~

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,928
  • back at 63° 49′ 32″ N
    • jojonas @ flickr
Re: 100tmx>1600 HC110 'B' 26C 60' semi stand
« Reply #4 on: January 30, 2015, 09:58:10 AM »
I'd try it again to see if I could replicate the result! :)
/jonas

k.hendrik

  • 120
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: 100tmx>1600 HC110 'B' 26C 60' semi stand
« Reply #5 on: January 30, 2015, 10:52:43 AM »
I try to describe the process: after the 'strange' developing/stopbath/fix I saw there was still a greyish layer on the film, I try to remove this with 100% fix rinse, didn't work. half hour water rinse, bath with anti-dry spots(????) dry, negs still opaque. After some weeks give it another try; another rinse with WARM water and treatment with 'cleaning pads' from the missus and then the 'emulsion' partially solved with this result :) it looks like an 'aquatint' from my etching days. Don't have a wet darkroom yet but love to see a big print from this. The thing I don't understand is the developing part; did this before with a clear neg as a result(try to find it) when I 'master' this process I would like to try it on 9x12 format so I can use ear-tip or smaller pieces to treat the film surface.
thanks for looking

« Last Edit: January 30, 2015, 12:02:07 PM by k.hendrik »